Meta and Snap Face Los Angeles Youth Social Media Addiction Trial as Haidt Documents Surface
Photo: CBS NewsJury selection began in Los Angeles in a trial against Meta Platforms and Snap, brought by two plaintiffs who say the companies' platforms were designed to be addictive and harmed their mental health. The plaintiffs, a 16-year-old from Illinois identified as S.J. and an 18-year-old from Mississippi identified as K.D.B., sued in 2023. They allege that endless scrolling, Snapstreaks and other features kept them hooked and contributed to problems including depression, anxiety, an eating disorder, suicidal ideation and self-harm. TikTok and Alphabet's YouTube were original defendants but settled before trial, and Meta also settled with S.J. A Meta spokesperson said the company disagrees with K.D.B.'s allegations. The case is the latest in a wave of suits over social media's effect on young people. Separately, documents unsealed in California federal court last Friday include notes from a March 2023 Meta meeting on well-being. The notes say an executive named Curtiss, likely research chief Curtiss Cobb, set a goal of discrediting social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation. Staffers also discussed a quiet strategy to turn academics against him and contacting a media figure called Gellman about a takedown piece.
The right-leaning New York Post leads with the unsealed documents, with a headline about a Meta "whisper strategy" against Haidt. It stresses the meeting notes, the executive named Curtiss and the unidentified Gellman, and notes that Meta lost a Los Angeles addiction case earlier this year, citing Haidt's tobacco-industry comparison. It does not feature the plaintiffs. The left-leaning CBS News leads with the start of jury selection, naming S.J. and K.D.B., listing their alleged harms, quoting the complaint's design allegations and detailing the settlements and Meta's response. It does not mention Haidt or the documents. Both sides center on Meta and youth mental health, but they differ on whether the story is the courtroom case or the company's internal conduct. Reuters, listed as alternative, largely matches CBS in framing the trial as a legal test.
How the sides differ Right sources focus on unsealed Meta documents about discrediting critic Jonathan Haidt; left sources focus on the plaintiffs and trial start; alternative sources frame it as a legal test.
Headline, comparison and summary written by AI from the articles below. AI can make mistakes, so check the original articles before relying on a detail.
CBS News leads with jury selection in Los Angeles, naming the two plaintiffs, their alleged harms, the settlements by TikTok, YouTube and Meta with S.J., and Meta's disagreement with K.D.B.'s claims.
Reuters frames the trial of two teenage plaintiffs against Meta and Snap as a major legal test of youth social media addiction claims, starting Wednesday in Los Angeles.
The New York Post leads with newly unsealed court documents it says show Meta employees plotting to discredit critic Jonathan Haidt, citing meeting notes, an executive named Curtiss and Haidt's own remarks.