Zelenskyy Says US Has Resumed Sharing Warnings of Russian Missile Attacks With Ukraine
Photo: The GuardianUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Tuesday that the United States has resumed giving Kyiv advance warnings of Russian ballistic missile attacks, a step he said would save civilian lives. He spoke after meeting US envoy Steve Witkoff in Norway. A day earlier, Zelenskyy and air force spokesperson Yuri Ihnat said Ukraine got no US warning before a Russian barrage hit Kyiv power plants around 11pm Sunday, though one came before a 3am strike. Witkoff is due to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday. A US official told Reuters he aims to create a pathway toward trilateral and wider negotiations, and called the Oslo talks constructive. On Friday, President Donald Trump waived a sanctions package on Russia, and on Tuesday he said Zelenskyy could make a deal.
Right-leaning outlets had not reported this story at the time of writing; left-leaning and alternative/independent outlets had. Left-leaning coverage (The Guardian) stresses strained US-Ukraine relations, Trump's criticism of Zelenskyy and the sanctions waiver. The alternative outlet (AP) leads with the resumed warnings, linking them to a call with Rubio.
How the sides differ Left and alternative sources both report warnings resuming; left sources add US-Ukraine tensions and sanctions context, alternative cites a Rubio call, and right sources have not covered it.
Headline, comparison and summary written by AI from the articles below. AI can make mistakes, so check the original articles before relying on a detail.
The Guardian leads with Zelenskyy's statements on missed and resumed warnings, adding the Witkoff talks, Trump's criticism, the sanctions waiver, and Ukrainian air force and government voices.
AP leads with Zelenskyy saying early warnings resumed after a call with Rubio, following strikes he said came with too little notice for civilians.
Not covering this story. None of the right-leaning outlets Crosswire tracks has reported it yet. What one side leaves out can be as telling as what the others report.