Justice Kagan Says Supreme Court Rulings Have Harmed Democracy Ahead of Nov. 3 Midterms
Photo: The New York TimesJustice Elena Kagan said on Tuesday that the Supreme Court's conservative majority has undermined democracy through rulings on voting rights, partisan gerrymandering and campaign finance. She spoke at Catholic University's law school in Washington. Kagan, who dissented in those cases, said the majority lacked appropriate concern for the consequences of its decisions and has produced a democracy that works less well than it should. She cited the 2019 ruling that federal courts cannot limit extreme partisan gerrymandering, a ruling this year weakening the Voting Rights Act that led Republican states to eliminate majority Black districts, and the most recent campaign finance ruling, in June. Several states have redrawn congressional maps before the Nov. 3 midterms, increasingly eliminating competitive districts.
Right-leaning outlets had not reported this story at the time of writing; left-leaning and alternative outlets had. Left-leaning outlets focus on Kagan's remarks. The New York Times stresses her view that the rulings have deepened polarization, while NBC News gives her quotes and the specific rulings and redistricting effects. The alternative outlet Truthout, in the material available, frames the Roberts Court as dismantling safeguards that kept elections peaceful and prevented a president from turning state agencies against rivals.
How the sides differ Left sources stress Kagan's remarks on gerrymandering, voting rights and polarization; alternative sources frame the court's rulings as removing safeguards on presidential power; right sources have not covered it.
Headline, comparison and summary written by AI from the articles below. AI can make mistakes, so check the original articles before relying on a detail.
The New York Times leads with Kagan's view that rulings deepened polarization before the midterms. NBC News features her direct criticism and details the gerrymandering, Voting Rights Act and campaign finance rulings.
Truthout takes a broader view, arguing the Roberts Court has dismantled safeguards that kept elections peaceful and barred presidents from using state agencies against political rivals.
Not covering this story. None of the right-leaning outlets Crosswire tracks has reported it yet. What one side leaves out can be as telling as what the others report.