Same News | Different Views

NewsPublished 2 outlets

Merck and Moderna Say Personalized mRNA Melanoma Vaccine Cut Recurrence Risk in Phase 3 Trial

The full story

Merck and Moderna reported that an experimental personalized mRNA vaccine, called intismeran, given with the immunotherapy drug Keytruda, reduced the risk of melanoma recurrence or death by 42% compared with Keytruda alone. The Phase 3 trial enrolled 1,137 patients with Stage IIB-IV melanoma whose tumors had been surgically removed. The companies released detailed results Thursday: at two years, 82.2% of patients given the vaccine plus Keytruda were alive without recurrence, versus 70% on Keytruda alone. The combination also cut the risk of distant spread or death by 38%. Dr. Marjorie Green, Merck's head of oncology clinical development, told The New York Times the vaccine effectively trains the body to recognize and kill the cancer, and said Merck plans to seek regulatory approval as soon as possible. Scientists sequence each patient's tumor to find mutated proteins found only on cancer cells, then use mRNA to train the immune system to attack them. The technology is the same Nobel Prize-winning mRNA approach behind COVID-19 vaccines. Researchers are also testing therapeutic vaccines for kidney, bladder, non-small-cell lung and pancreatic cancer and glioblastoma.

Right-leaning Daily Wire leads with the trial's numbers, including the 42% and 38% risk reductions, the two-year survival rates and the 1,137-patient size, and quotes Merck's Green and a researcher, Dr. Robert Vonderheide. Its headline calls the vaccine a promising advance. Left-leaning outlets tracked by Crosswire had not reported this story at the time of writing, while alternative and right-leaning outlets had. The Times of Israel, the alternative source, offers a distinct angle: its headline stresses that the vaccine sharply lowers the chance of tumors returning, and it names intismeran and ties it to the COVID-19 mRNA technology. The available text shows no real factual conflict between the two, only different emphases.

How the sides differ Left sources have not covered it; right sources give trial figures and Merck quotes, while alternative sources stress the vaccine's name and its link to COVID-19 mRNA technology.

Headline, comparison and summary written by AI from the articles below. AI can make mistakes, so check the original articles before relying on a detail.

Share
Left

Not covering this story. None of the left-leaning outlets Crosswire tracks has reported it yet. What one side leaves out can be as telling as what the others report.

Alternative The Times of IsraelNew vaccine slashes chance of melanoma patients’ tumors returning, study shows

The Times of Israel leads with the vaccine sharply lowering the chance of tumor recurrence, names intismeran, and notes its link to the mRNA technology behind COVID-19 vaccines.

Right Daily WirePersonalized Cancer Vaccine Shows Promise In Major Trial

Daily Wire leads with trial figures and the path to approval, quoting Merck's Dr. Marjorie Green and researcher Dr. Robert Vonderheide, and describes the vaccine as promising.